Table ten:Form and you may Standard Deviations of the Polyamorous Take to According to Latest Relationships Sort of and you may Comfort and ease which have Disclosure to Psychological state Advantages.
As can get noticed inside Table eleven, pairwise comparisons learned that polyamorous some body already during the low-the full time nonmonogamous matchmaking claimed down total dating satisfaction (given that mentioned by GMREL complete measure rating) than just polyamorous anyone inside the monogamous dating (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous relationships (p=0.00), nonhierarchical non-monogamous matchmaking (p=0.00), swinging matchmaking (p=0.00), triad matchmaking (p=0.00), polyfidelity relationships (p=0.00), polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.00), tribe/ pod dating (p=0.00), “other” relationship (p=0.00), and you may polyamorous people who stated that these were “undecided” regarding their newest dating variety of (p=0.00).
Difference in newest relationships kind of and you can sexual satisfaction once the mentioned because of the this new GMSEX
47; F(11,6018)=, p=0.00). Follow-right up univariate ANOVAs unearthed that there was an improvement anywhere between most recent dating variety of into the most of the dimensions of the fresh GMSEX: Aspect step 1 (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), Dimension 2 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Aspect 3 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Dimension 4 (F(11,993)=, p=0.00), Dimensions 5 (F(eleven,993)=, p=0.00), while the complete scale rating, total relationship fulfillment (F(11,993)=, p=0.00). To recognize and this matchmaking sizes differed where almost every other relationship systems, pairwise contrasting was indeed held (Tukey HSD).
As can get noticed from inside the Dining table twelve, pairwise evaluations unearthed that polyamorous someone currently inside low-enough time nonmonogamous matchmaking stated that its current sexual relationships was indeed quicker rewarding (since the measured of the Measurement step 1 on GMSEX) than simply polyamorous anyone in monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and polyfamily relationship (p=0.00). Pairwise contrasting unearthed that polyamorous someone currently inside the monogamous relationship stated its newest relationship was shorter rewarding (because counted by the Aspect 1 to your GMSEX) than simply polyamorous some body from inside the moving (p=0.05) and you can polyfamily dating(p=0.04). Pairwise evaluations discovered that polyamorous individuals already for the “other” recognized relationships claimed their sexual dating had been less rewarding (since the counted by the Measurement step one with the GMSEX) than just polyamorous some body within the non-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.03), swinging (p=0.01), and you will polyfamily dating (p=0.01). While doing so, pairwise evaluations found that polyamorous people that identified as “undecided” about their current dating variety of reported that its sexual relationships had been quicker fulfilling (once the mentioned from the Dimension step 1 for the GMSEX) than polyamorous someone inside swinging matchmaking (p=0.05).
As can get noticed inside Desk 13, pairwise comparisons discovered that polyamorous anybody in the low-enough time non-monogamous relationship stated that its most recent intimate relationships have been less fulfilling (since the mentioned because of the Dimensions 2 on the GMSEX) than just polyamorous somebody during the monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical low-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you may polyfamily relationship (p=0.00). Pairwise contrasting discovered that polyamorous individuals currently when you look at the monogamous relationship said their sugar babies Michigan City IN sexual relationships was indeed less satisfying (given that mentioned by the Aspect 2 with the GMSEX) than simply polyamorous somebody inside low-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.04) and you will polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.03). Concurrently, pairwise evaluations learned that polyamorous people who recognized as “undecided” inside their current relationships sort of reported that its intimate relationships was basically less rewarding (since measured from the Measurement 2 to your GMSEX) than simply polyamorous anyone for the moving (p=0.05) and you can polyfamily matchmaking (p=0.02).
Multivariate examination have been used and discovered there is a serious difference in latest relationship models with the a good linear blend of dimensions off sexual pleasure and you will overall sexual joy given that measured of the GMSEX (Wilks’ Lambda=0
As can be seen inside the Table fourteen, pairwise contrasting found that polyamorous people from inside the non-the time non-monogamous matchmaking stated that their most recent sexual relationships was indeed faster fulfilling (due to the fact counted of the Dimension 3 towards the GMSEX) than just polyamorous somebody inside monogamous (p=0.00), hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), non-hierarchical non-monogamous (p=0.00), moving (p=0.00), triad (p=0.00), polyfidelity (p=0.00), and you may polyfamily dating (p=0.00). Pairwise comparisons found that polyamorous someone inside the monogamous dating stated that the latest sexual dating have been reduced rewarding (due to the fact mentioned of the Aspect 3 into GMSEX) than polyamorous some one during the polyfamily relationship (p=0.02). At exactly the same time, pairwise contrasting unearthed that polyamorous some body inside the polyfamily relationship reported that the newest sexual relationships were more satisfying (because counted by Measurement step 3 to your GMSEX) than polyamorous some body for the “other” relationships (p=0.02) and you can polyamorous individuals who identified as “undecided” inside their newest relationship type of (p=0.01).